Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  27 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

The Corporate Governance Committee

The Corporate Governance Committee

has the

following primary duties and responsibilities: (i)

selecting individuals qualified to serve as Directors of

the Company to be nominated to stand for election to

the Board of Directors (as discussed in the “Director

Nominating Process” section beginning on page 19); (ii)

recommending to the Board, Directors to serve on

committees of the Board; (iii) advising the Board with

respect to matters of Board composition and

procedures; (iv) developing and recommending to the

Board a set of corporate governance principles

applicable to the Company; (v) monitoring compliance

with the Company’s political participation program; and

(vi) overseeing the evaluation of the Board and the

Company’s management and succession planning. The

Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of

Directors is composed of Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH

(Chair), Robert B. Johnson, and Melvin T. Stith. All

Corporate Governance Committee members qualify as

“outside” Directors as defined by Section 162(m), “Non-

employee Directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3

under the Exchange Act, and independent Directors

under the NYSE listing standards. The Corporate

Governance Committee operates under a written

charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The

Corporate Governance Committee met three times

during 2014.

The Compensation Committee

The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee

include the following: (i) to review, at least annually, the

goals and objectives of the Company’s executive

compensation plans; (ii) to evaluate annually the

performance of the CEO with respect to such goals and

objectives; (iii) to determine the CEO’s compensation

level based on this evaluation; (iv) to evaluate annually

the performance of the other executive officers of the

Company in light of such goals and objectives, and set

their compensation levels based on this evaluation and

the recommendation of the CEO; (v) to review the

Company’s incentive compensation programs to

determine whether they encourage excessive risk

taking, and evaluate compensation policies and

practices that could mitigate any such risk; and (vi) to

review the Company’s general compensation and

benefit plans with respect to the goals and objectives of

these plans. The Compensation Committee also

reviews and approves compensation levels, equity-

linked incentive compensation, and annual incentive

awards, sometimes referred to as non-equity incentives,

under the Company’s Management Incentive Plan

(“MIP”) for all executive officers including those who are

members of the Board.

With respect to Non-employee Director compensation,

the Compensation Committee recommends to the

Board a policy regarding Non-employee Director

compensation and has recommended to the Board

Non-employee Director compensation consistent with

such policy. The Board makes final determinations

regarding Non-employee Director compensation.

The Compensation Committee retains a nationally

recognized compensation consultant, Mercer LLC (the

“Consultant”), to assist and advise the Compensation

Committee in its deliberations regarding executive

compensation. The Consultant works with the

Compensation Committee in the review of executive

compensation practices, including the competitiveness

of pay levels, design issues, market trends, and other

technical considerations.

The Consultant typically assists in the following areas:

providing comparative company performance to

determine CEO pay;

providing an evaluation of the competitiveness

of the Company’s executive compensation and

benefit programs;

reviewing plan

design

issues

and

recommending potential

improvement

opportunities;

apprising the Compensation Committee of

trends and developments in the marketplace;

assessing the relationship between executive

pay and performance;

assessing proposed performance goals and

ranges for incentive plans;

providing comparative company data to

determine NEO compensation;

conducting compensation training sessions for

the Compensation Committee; and

determining the compensation of Non-

employee Directors.

Fees paid to the Consultant for executive compensation

consulting services totaled $246,926 in 2014.

Management retained affiliated companies of the

Consultant to provide additional services not pertaining

to executive compensation during 2014, and approved

payments totaling $5,223,957 for those services. These

payments principally consisted of broker commissions

23