Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  58 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 58 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

Distributions attributable to discretionary contributions

are made in the form and at the time specified by the

Company.

A Participant may delay the timing and form of his or

her distributions attributable to his or her deferrals as

long as the change is made at least 12 months before

the initial distribution date. With respect to non-

grandfathered amounts, new elections also must satisfy

the additional requirements of Section 409A. In general,

Section 409A requires that distributions may not be

accelerated (other than for hardships) and any delayed

distribution may not begin earlier than five years after

the original distribution date.

Deferral amounts for which no distribution elections

have been made are distributed in a lump sum six

months after a Participant separates from service.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

The Company has employment agreements with each

of the NEOs (although the agreement with Mr. Tonoike

expired on December 31, 2014). Except as described

below, the agreements are similar in nature and contain

provisions relating to termination, disability, death and a

change in control of the Company.

Mr. Daniel P. Amos, in the fourth quarter of 2008,

decided to voluntarily forgo all “golden parachute” and

other severance components in his employment

agreement (the provisions providing for special

payments in connection with a change in control of the

Company or other termination of employment). The

elimination of these potential payments to Mr. Daniel P.

Amos has been reflected in the following 2014 Potential

Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

table.

For the remaining NEOs (other than Mr. Daniel P.

Amos), the Company remains obligated to continue

compensation and benefits to the NEO for the

scheduled term of the agreement if the employment of

the NEO is terminated by the Company without “good

cause” or by the NEO with “good reason.” Messrs.

Cloninger and Paul S. Amos II are not entitled to

continued compensation after earning the maximum

benefit under the SERP; Mr. Cloninger has earned the

maximum SERP benefit and, therefore, would not

receive continued compensation. In addition, except for

Mr. Kirsch, upon a termination by the Company without

good cause or by the NEO for good reason, all

outstanding equity awards become fully vested.

If the NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company

for “good cause,” or by the NEO without “good reason,”

the Company is generally obligated to pay

compensation and benefits only to the date of

termination (except that the NEO, to the extent

otherwise eligible, is entitled to benefits under the

RPSO or SERP if the termination is not for “good

cause”). “Good cause” generally means (i) the willful

failure by the NEO to substantially perform his

management duties for more than 60 days, (ii)

intentional conduct by the NEO causing substantial

injury to the Company, or (iii) the conviction of or plea of

guilty by the NEO to a felony crime involving moral

turpitude. “Good reason” is defined to include (i) a

material breach of the agreement, (ii) a material

diminution or change in the NEO’s title, duties, or

authority, or (iii) a material relocation of the Company’s

principal offices. Upon voluntary termination without

“good reason” or termination by the Company for “good

cause,” the NEO is prohibited for a two-year period from

directly or indirectly competing with the Company.

The employment agreements of the NEOs (with the

exception of Mr. Kirsch) provide that compensation and

benefits continue for certain specified periods in the

event that the NEO becomes totally disabled although

the amount of continued compensation for Messrs.

Kriss Cloninger and Paul S. Amos II will be reduced by

60% if they are eligible for the maximum benefit

percentage under the SERP. Upon the death of the

NEO (other than Mr. Kirsch), his estate is to be paid an

amount, payable over a three-year period, equal to the

NEO’s base salary and any non-equity incentive award

actually paid during the last three years of his life.

Upon a “change in control” of the Company, the

employment agreements of the NEOs (with the

exception of Messrs. Daniel P. Amos and Kirsch) are

extended for an additional three-year period. If,

following a change in control, the NEOs’ (with the

exception of Messrs. Daniel P. Amos and Kirsch)

employment with the Company is terminated by the

Company without “good cause” or by the NEO for “good

reason,” the Company must pay to the NEO, among

other payments but in lieu of any further salary

payments subsequent to the date of termination, a

lump-sum severance payment equal to three times the

sum of the NEO’s base salary and non-equity incentive

award under the MIP (as paid during periods specified

in the agreement). If either of Messrs. Cloninger or

Paul S. Amos II has attained the maximum benefit

percentage under the SERP at the time of his

termination following the change in control, he will not

54