Previous Page  47 / 108 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 47 / 108 Next Page
Page Background

STEP 5

DETERMINE CEO’S FINAL

PBRS GRANT AND ADJUST

CONTINGENT PBRS TO REFLECT

ACTUAL RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

RANKING

The resulting implied compensation level determined

in Step 4 was used to determine the CEO’s PBRS

grant for 2016. The contingent grant to the CEO in

February 2016 was trued-up as of December 31, 2016.

Together with base salary and MIP, the final PBRS grant

aligns the CEO’s total direct compensation with the

Company’s relative performance versus the peer group.

STEP 6

DETERMINE PRESIDENT’S FINAL

PBRS GRANT

Once the CEO’s compensation package is determined,

the President’s compensation package is fixed at 55%

of that amount. The resulting implied compensation

level was used in determining the President’s PBRS

grant for 2016.

ENDING GRANT RESULT

For 2016, the above-described process resulted

in the CEO receiving a true-up of 131,246 shares

of PBRS, and the President receiving a true-up of

70,010 shares of PBRS. See “2016 Grants of Plan-

based Awards” table for additional information.

Contingent Vesting of PBRS Grants

In addition to having to earn the PBRS grant amount based upon the Company’s relative financial and TSR

performance, the 2016 grant of PBRS is not guaranteed; vesting is contingent upon the Company achieving the

three-year RBC performance thresholds discussed under “Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program–

Long-term Equity Incentives” on page 38. Thus, unlike many companies where an LTI award need only be earned

once, the CEO’s and President’s LTI awards must be earned twice:

●●

Total grant for the year is based upon relative financial performance (56% weighting) and relative TSR

performance (44% weighting) for the current year, and

●●

The grant operates like the PBRS program for other NEOs (based on future performance against a pre-

established, Compensation Committee-approved metric and performance level).

As a result, we believe our approach to these two senior executives’ LTI grants, and the overall compensation

packages awarded these individuals, reflects the Company’s continuing strong commitment to pay for

performance.

Compensation Discussion & Analysis

|

 CEO and President Compensation and Pay-for-Performance

AFLAC INCORPORATED

2017 PROXY STATEMENT

41