Previous Page  49 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

Officers have four years from date of hire or promotion

to satisfy their respective stock ownership guidelines.

Non-employee Directors must own four times the

annual retainer and have five years from the date first

elected to the Board to satisfy these guidelines.

Ownership includes all shares held by the officer or

Board member and their spouse as well as tenure-

based, unvested restricted shares. Shares pledged as

collateral for a margin account or other loan,

performance-based restricted shares, and stock options

(vested or unvested) do not count toward these stock

ownership guidelines.

Each of the Company’s NEOs has stock ownership that

exceeds ownership guidelines or is working toward

meeting respective ownership guidelines within the

allowed four-year time frame.

Progress toward meeting

the guidelines is reviewed regularly and reported to the

Board.

The Company's insider trading policy prohibits our

Board members, officers and other covered persons

from selling our Common Stock “short,” engaging in

option trading (puts, calls, or other derivative securities)

relating to our Common Stock, entering into a 10b5-1

plan (unless approved by the Compensation

Committee) or hedging. In addition, at its February 2013

meeting, the Board adopted a policy prohibiting future

pledging of the Company’s stock by executive officers

and Board members. All other covered persons under

the Company's insider trading policy must pre-clear with

the policy’s compliance officer before pledging

Company stock as collateral for a margin account or

other loan.

Employment Agreements

The Company has employment agreements with the

NEOs and certain other executives in key roles. The

agreements generally address: role and responsibility;

rights to compensation and benefits during active

employment; termination in the event of death, disability

or retirement, and termination for cause or without

cause; and resignation by the employee. Some

agreements also contain termination and related pay

provisions in the event of a change in control. For the

applicable change-in-control provisions in the

employment agreements to apply, there must be both

(i) a change in control and (ii) a termination by the

Company without cause or a resignation by the

executive for good reason. This is commonly

referenced as a “double trigger” requirement. Further,

the contracts stipulate that the executive may not

compete with the Company for prescribed periods

following termination of employment or disclose

confidential information.

The payments that may be made under each NEO’s

employment agreement upon termination

of

employment under specified circumstances are

described in more detail below under “Potential

Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Change-in-Control (“CIC”) Policy and Severance Agreements

The Company has no formal change in control or

severance policy. However, as noted above, individual

employment agreements generally have provisions

related to both CIC and severance. These agreements

provide no excise tax gross-ups.

Compensation Recovery (“Clawback”) Policy

The Company has a “Clawback” policy that allows it to

review any adjustment or restatement of performance

measures and make a determination if adjustments or

recoveries of non-equity incentives are necessary. If it

is deemed that adjustments or recoveries of non-equity

incentives are appropriate, the Compensation

Committee is charged with determining the amount of

recovery and the proper officer group subject to any

potential adjustments or recovery.

Certain Tax Implications of Executive Compensation (IRC Section 162(m))

In connection with making decisions on executive

compensation, the Compensation Committee takes into

consideration the provisions of IRC Section 162(m),

which limits the deductibility by the Company for federal

income tax purposes of certain categories of

compensation in excess of $1 million paid to certain

executive officers. It is the Company’s policy to

maximize the effectiveness of the compensation

programs while also taking into consideration the

requirements of IRC Section 162(m). In that regard, the

42